What Mitt Thinks is Funny

Courtesy of TPM, from an interview by Josh Tyrangiel with Romney in Bloomberg Businessweek, he’s asked about the emblematic photo of him with his Bain colleagues:

“When you look at it now, does that photo of you and your Bain colleagues posing with money in your pinstripe suits make you laugh or make you cringe?”
“Oh, that was a moment of humor as we had just done what we thought was impossible. We had raised $37 million from other people and institutions who entrusted us with their funds, and we thought it was a miracle that our group had been able to be so successful in fundraising. And ultimately we were able to yield for them a very attractive return by such investments as Staples (SPLS), which was in our very first fund.”

Hilarious, right?

Also worth noting from the full interview, is this softball question, which elicits only an utterly unresponsive response:

“On the subject of leadership, why does Mormonism produce such a disproportionate number of political and business leaders?”
“I don’t know that I have an answer for you on that. I believe that people of faith by and large have a great interest in the institution of family and that a family is a great place to learn leadership skills. I’m sure I benefited by having a Mom and Dad, both of whom were actively involved in the community and in various enterprises. And by watching them interact with other people, I learned the kinds of lessons which serve me well. I presume that’s true for people of faith, if their faith, like mine, draws you to your family.”

Clearly, Mitt doesn’t want to say anything substantive about being Mormon or his Mormonism. Reading Jon Krakauer’s Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith, which I am currently making my way through, I can see why. Like many religions, this is a movement with a blood-soaked history, and a bizarre theology–including so-called posthumous baptisms– that adherents to the faith nowadays would just as soon not discuss in public.

Finally, Mitt also slips the knot when Tyrangiel asks him about his tax returns:

“Let’s frame the issue around your tax returns in a slightly different way. If you’re an investor and you’re looking at a company, and that company says that its great strength is wise management and fiscal know-how, wouldn’t you want to see the previous, say, five years’ worth of its financials?”
“I’m not a business. We have a process in this country, which was established by law, which provides for the transparency which candidates are required to meet. I have met with that requirement with full financial disclosure of all my investments, but in addition have provided and will provide a full two years of tax returns. This happens to be exactly the same as with John McCain when he ran for office four years ago. And the Obama team had no difficulty with that circumstance. The difference between then and now is that President Obama has a failed economic record and is trying to find any issue he can to deflect from the failure of his record. Thanks, guys. Goodbye.”

The thing here that caught my eye is the “I’m not a business” statement. As Aaron Blake put it this afternoon in The Fix,”The man who once said ‘corporations are people’ apparently doesn’t believe the inverse.” Truth, or what Romney says, is all about what’s convenient at the moment, not what he really believes. This photo of Mitt lost in a cornfield accompanied Blake’s Washington Post story. Now that’s funny!

Back in NYC–Blogging/Working/Watching Olympics

Nice being away for more than two weeks’ vacation, and now real good being back home in Manhattan. Catching up to things here for the blog, which I didn’t post to very much or tend while I was away. Looking to get back in to the writing and posting and rthym right away.

While catching up on the blog and my book company biz, I’m also catching up on some Olympics action that I’d had a chance only to read about–the amazingly competitive US-Canada women’s football match from last weekend. The NBC rebroadcast I’m watching in NY on channel 450 shows what an epic seesaw affair it was. I know the US wins 4-3; the match is now heading to overtime periods, tied 3-3. It’s become a contentious contest with referees’ calls playing a key role. Canada was leading 3-2 when two calls went against them: Their goalie was flagged for holding the ball too long after a save, leading to a penalty kick; on the kick, the ball caromed off a Canadian defender, leading to a free kick which Abby Wambach nailed for the equalizer.

To this point, Canada’s Christine Sinclair has scored a hat trick, at least two of which were precise headers, and Megan Rapinoe has two goals. One of hers, the kick that tied the score at 1-1 early in the second half, was a rarity–an unassisted corner! Her other one, making it 2-2, also showed a very adroit foot. I’ve heard that Canada may file some form of protest, so I’m watching for the next controversial whistle. The US hasn’t led for a second, yet.

Whistleblowers on Speakerfile

Delighted to have my recent blog essay, On the Imperative of Publishing Whistleblowers, republished today on the blog of Speakerfile, the company I consult for that connects conference organizers with authors who do public speaking. H/t Neal Maillett of Berrett-Koehler Publishers for his piece, Why We Publisher Whistleblowers, which inspired my own, and Mike Shatzkin, who alerted me to Neal’s essay. Also, thanks to Cara Posey of Speakerfile who solicited this post from me.

Gone Fishin’

I am away from my desk this week and next on a combined train and road trip with my family. I will be posting entries from time to time. Until later then, I hope you’re having a nice summer, and look for me later in this space.